Lack of 'rural-proofed' policy a threat to countryside economy Entrepreneurs are losing out because of a lack of rural-proofing in government policy, say academics from 缅北禁地鈥檚 Queen鈥檚 Award winning Centre for Rural Economy (CRE). In a new paper they argue that the diverse rural economy is too often considered to be exclusively agricultural and maintain that rural policymaking should be more crosscutting, embracing a range of policy influences that impinge upon the countryside. The paper, 鈥 NU%20CRE%20Rural%20Policy%20(web)鈥 calls for improvements in a number of specific areas to push growth policy beyond a focus on farming, forestry and food sectors. The also recommends that policymakers ensure regional growth bodies such as Local Enterprise Partnerships and Combined Authorities have a strong remit to reflect the diversity of businesses. , Director of the CRE, said: 鈥淲e need to see government instituting formal rural-proofing measures. Rural areas need integrated policy to address issues: they aren鈥檛 just the remit of Defra, and they aren鈥檛 just about farming. 鈥淭he rural economy is diverse and entrepreneurial, the Government is missing a trick in not capitalising on rural potential to help fuel economic recovery.鈥 鈥楻eimagining the rural鈥 makes the case for the significance of the countryside economy in the wider success of the UK, stressing that:鈥&苍产蝉辫;The economy is worth £400bn (19 percent) of the UK鈥檚 Gross Value Added鈥&苍产蝉辫;It accounts for 20 percent of the UK working population and 28 percent of Britain鈥檚 firms鈥&苍产蝉辫;70 percent of workers in the rural economy are employed by small and micro-businesses, with only 15 percent employed in agriculture Guy Garrod added: 鈥淭hose running businesses in rural areas are innovative and want to grow their businesses as much as their urban counterparts. They face any number of challenges that could be eased by proper acknowledgement from government of how their circumstances differ from those in urban areas.鈥 The paper also highlights several significant areas of policymaking which have left countryside communities disadvantaged due to a failure to 鈥榬ural-proof鈥 policy by taking account of the different circumstances outside of urban areas. These include: 鈥&苍产蝉辫;EducationMore small schools face eventual closure due to a new funding formula which forces councils to apply a standardised formula across all schools 鈥&苍产蝉辫;WelfareThe so-called 鈥榖edroom tax鈥 for those with spare rooms hits poorer households especially hard because of the lack of smaller accommodation 鈥&苍产蝉辫;HousingThe proposal to end the provision of affordable housing on sites of less than 10 houses ignores the fact that the majority of countryside housing is provided on small, private developer-led sites. Guy Garrod commented: 鈥淵oung people in rural areas are facing the closure of their local schools, then being priced out of the housing market 鈥 it鈥檚 time that rural communities across the UK got a better deal from Westminster.鈥 鈥淲e鈥檝e published this paper as a call for government to give greater weight to rural issues when making policy.鈥 鈥楻eimagining the rural: What鈥檚 missing in UK rural policy?鈥 will be launched at an event hosted by the CRE at the Conservative Party Conference on Sunday 28 September 2014. published on: 26 September 2014