Comment: How the destruction of Palmyra played out on Twitter Published on: 12 December 2018 Writing for The Conversation, Dr Emma Cunliffe and Professor Luigi Curini discuss the reaction on Twitter to Islamic State's destruction of the ruins at Palmyra. , and , Pictures of the destruction of the have become iconic images of the conflict in Syria. These have been widely shared around the world as symbols of Islamic State鈥檚 barbarism 鈥� profiled alongside their extensive human rights violations, such as the . But new research from the universities of 缅北禁地 and Milan, published in , suggests the destruction also received some support from the Arabic-speaking public. IS is not the first group to purposefully destroy heritage. The in Afghanistan also shocked the world. but IS鈥檚 鈥溾�� has far-reaching impacts. We wanted to understand what the Arabic-speaking world had to say about the issue, so we used 鈥溾��. This is a technique that involves categorising opinions in statements into whether they are positive, negative, or neutral, as well as categorising the reasons expressed to support such sentiments and then analysing the results. Categorisations are usually done manually to catch sarcasm and idioms, but our method allowed us to automatically and accurately analyse 1.5m publicly available Arabic-language tweets explicitly discussing the topic over nine months. Tower Tombs in a Palmyrene necropolis, Syria, destroyed by Islamic State in 2015. Unknown, Our study included widely shared reports of destruction 鈥� such as news stories, photographs and videos circulated on social media 鈥� as well as incidents that have only been discovered by analysis of satellite imagery. We also included instances of IS鈥檚 , and the repurposing of sites (such as ), as we assumed all of these would affect sentiment towards the extremist group. In general, our research found that a fifth (21.7%) of tweets that expressed an opinion about these IS abuses of heritage actually supported it. Given the widespread Western media coverage of Palmyra, the team then decided to focus specifically on its impact in our study. We took a subset of our data containing sentiments about attacks to archaeological sites and analysed the amount of positive sentiment. Then we ran the analysis again without Palmyra, to see whether it made any difference to the way people considered IS鈥檚 damage. Was there a greater amount of support (positive sentiment) for the destruction Palmyra compared with other archaeological sites? Below is an example of one such tweet we found with sentiments about the destruction of Palmyra: 鈥淭he lions of the Islamic State are blowing up the temple (Temple of Baalshamin) in the city of Palmyra, and eventually by God鈥檚 will they will blow up the pyramids and the Sphinx鈥� Tweet from August 23, 2018 (translated from Arabic and anonymised). Islamic state onslaught Our study period ran from August 1 2015 to June 30 2016. Before it, in May 2015, the and the adjacent archaeological site of Palmyra. IS then used the ancient theatre for , destroyed the , and . Within our study period, IS and in August 2015. In October 2015, they destroyed the , and then three columns . Satellite imagery revealed that 11 . IS also beheaded , the former head of Palmyra Antiquities. Read more: After the study period, we learned , and IS鈥檚 second occupation of Palmyra (December 2016 to March 2017) involved . Khaled al Asaad, former head of antiquities at Palmyra, was beheaded by Islamic State in August 2015 at the age of 83. Wikipedia Bombs and tweets As you might expect, given its prominence as a World Heritage site, the amount of online discussion increased when attacks on Palmyra were reported 鈥� but the overall levels of positive and negative sentiment were unaffected. Reports of Palmyra鈥檚 destruction did not attract more support than reports of attacks on other archaeological sites 鈥� but the destruction didn鈥檛 significantly lessen support for IS, either. However, it did drastically increase coverage of IS鈥檚 actions. In that sense, the destruction at Palmyra was a successful propaganda coup. It could even have contributed to the support for recruitment seen in some tweets. When the reasons for expressing positive and negative sentiments about IS attacks on heritage were categorised, a fifth (21.5%) of the positive tweets related to what we termed as 鈥渞ecruit through the broadcasting of their ideology鈥� 鈥� the third-largest category of reasons for support. Yet, while IS appear highly strategic in their social media actions, the strategy is not coherent or consistently followed. The destruction of the temples was featured in Dabiq 9 (IS鈥檚 English-language magazine), and a photograph of al Asaad鈥檚 body and a video of the museum damage was released on their social media channels. These were the only events claimed by IS. Other events 鈥� including those from their second occupation 鈥� were reported by journalists or discovered via satellite imagery analysis, suggesting that IS was not always prompt to capitalise on its destruction of Palmyra. Although Western media has focused on Palmyra, the most common category of support (34.5%) for heritage attacks from our analysis related to perceived , rather than relating to a specific site or type of site. The highest levels of dislike came not from Palmyra, but from the destruction of Islamic sites and cemetery attacks. So if we want to protect these important sites it鈥檚 important to move beyond the buildings to engage with the communities that have been targeted. Focusing simply on Palmyra鈥檚 antiquities fails to see the people behind the heritage 鈥� or to understand why they are threatened. And we now know that this understanding is essential to counter a threat that affects not only heritage sites but the social cohesion of the region that created them. As other groups begin to copy IS鈥檚 strategies 鈥� for example where bombing has destroyed many antiquities 鈥� this issue can only become more urgent. , Research associate, and , Professor, This article is republished from under a Creative Commons license. Read the . Share: Latest News 缅北禁地 recognised with geography award 缅北禁地 has been awarded the Highly Commended Geographical Association Publishers Award for its collaboration with Time for Geography, the UK鈥檚 open-access, dedicated video platform. published on: 16 April 2026 缅北禁地 historians mark General Strike centenary To mark the 100th anniversary of the British General Strike and miners鈥� lock-out of 1926, historians at 缅北禁地 are organising a series of events on its enduring legacy. published on: 16 April 2026 Comment: NCP is in administration Writing for The Conversation, Erwei (David) Xiang discusses how some big companies like NCP are so dependent on debt that they can鈥檛 adjust to change. published on: 16 April 2026 Facts and figures
![缅北禁地 logo](/gomobileassets/img/logo.svg" "缅北禁地"){kind=logo}