Comment: Cambodia punished by EU over human rights violations Published on: 18 February 2020 Writing for The Conversation, Rhona Smith discusses the impact of the EU's decision to partially withdraw free access for Cambodian goods to the EU market. , The jobs of many hard-working women in Cambodia are at risk after the EU announced its intention to for Cambodian goods to the EU market due to the country鈥檚 鈥渟erious and systematic violations of human rights鈥. As one in a group of , Cambodia enjoys the most preferential trade arrangement with the EU under the (EBA) tariff, which offers quota and duty-free access to the EU single market for all goods except arms. Cambodia currently exports more than 鈧5 billion of goods to the EU, . In order to qualify for the EBA scheme, countries have to UN and International Labour Organisation conventions on human rights. Standard tariffs for certain products to Cambodia, including low-added-value garments and shoes, travel goods and sugar. But other products are still covered by the EBA, including high-added value clothes and shoes, and bicycles. Using tariffs as a lever This partial withdrawal of preferences of a country under the EBA tariff is unprecedented. The EU has fully and partially withdrawn trade preferences in the past 鈥 for and 鈥 but these countries were under less beneficial arrangements in the . The EU鈥檚 decision to only partially withdraw preferences for Cambodia arguably reflects the adverse impact of a full withdrawal on the socio-economic rights of the thousands of people working in the affected sectors. A full withdrawal would arguably also restrict current supply chains into the EU. The withdrawal is due to occur in August, bar any objection from the EU Council or parliament. The Cambodian government has time to ameliorate the situation, and the withdrawal decision could be reversed should the political space be opened significantly in the next few months. The EU Commission would look for the establishment of active political opposition, removal of restrictions on NGOs and more freedoms of assembly, expression and association. However, the view of the Cambodia Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation is clear: it the EU鈥檚 decision 鈥渦njust鈥 and 鈥減olitically driven鈥. The government also refutes the claims of violations of human rights. A spokesperson said the government: 鈥淩emains firm in its principled position in rejecting any attempt by external parties in their use of trade and development assistance as pretexts to justify their interference in Cambodia鈥檚 internal affairs.鈥 Such rhetoric is familiar to those in Cambodia. The government has external interference in the internal affairs of the country. It has engaged in discussions with the EU for two years, since 鈥渆nhanced engagement鈥 was after concerns were expressed in and . The process to temporarily suspend EBA privileges was in February 2019. Freedoms curtailed Such decisions on trade preferences are not technically sanctions, but they are designed to encourage the state to move into closer alignment with civil, labour and political rights. The EU is particularly concerned about the lack of a credible political opposition party in Cambodia, after the former opposition was . The country is now a de facto . The leader of the former opposition, Kem Sokha, is after he was detained in September 2017. His in November 2019 was welcomed by the EU but was not enough to assuage concerns. Human rights defenders, especially those working on land issues and , are frequently arrested, followed and have their , as I鈥檝e detailed in my role as the UN鈥檚 special rapporteur for human rights in Cambodia. There are ongoing violations of in Cambodia, though the country has made much progress made in the . The EU has in several areas. Setting a precedent The loss of this export market could have a negative impact on the socioeconomic rights of many people working in the textile sectors. Around 800,000 people, mostly women, . A fifth of Cambodia鈥檚 exports to the EU are affected, worth . But the measures taken by the EU against Cambodia are unlikely to have as dramatic an impact as . As the EU targeted its withdrawal at lower value items, where more people work, it will affect them, but the higher-skilled sector won鈥檛 be affected. Moreover, there are opportunities for Cambodia to conclude trade agreements with China (currently an influential development partner) or indeed with a post-Brexit UK, which has been one of the EU鈥檚 largest importers of Cambodian products. Nevertheless, the shockwaves may reverberate further. The EU continues to monitor human rights and labour rights in other EBA beneficiary countries including and . Either or both could yet have their trade preferences fully or partially withdrawn. The EU鈥檚 decision to partially withdraw preferences appears an attempt to balance its concern over civil and political rights with concerns over the impact a full withdrawal could have on socioeconomic rights of Cambodian workers, and perhaps the EU鈥檚 own markets. The Cambodian government its success in securing the peace and dramatic economic progress in the country in the 21st century. The EU decision focuses on justice and freedom but tries to mitigate the impact on development. It is a move that could have implications around the world for countries that do not uphold their human rights commitments. , Head of School, 缅北禁地 Law School, This article is republished from under a Creative Commons license. Read the . Share: Latest News 缅北禁地 expert highlights climate crisis in a new film A leading 缅北禁地 climate scientist is featured in a new film about how the climate and nature breakdown will affect the UK. published on: 14 April 2026 Neolithic tombs reveal ancient kinship ties Male individuals buried in Neolithic chambered tombs in northern Scotland were often related to each other through the paternal line and some were interred in the same or nearby tombs, research shows. published on: 14 April 2026 We are our Memories New exhibition by Fine Art graduate Trish Hudson-Moses, 22 April 鈥 4 May 2026 published on: 10 April 2026 Facts and figures