Comment: The Sagrada Familia Published on: 6 January 2022 Writing for The Conversation, Dr Josep-Maria Garcia-Fuentes discusses how Gaud铆鈥檚 masterpiece became a myth and a divisive political tool. The new tower stands completed, to the left, with its summit star in place. , The Sagrada Familia, Antoni Gaud铆鈥檚 Catalan masterpiece, recently celebrated the completion of the by hoisting a giant, 12-pointed star of metal and textured glass to its summit. After 140 years of construction on the church, this is the first of its six main towers to be finished and its outsized decoration now lights up the Barcelona nightscape. Not everyone is pleased though. The installation has been met with criticism about the ongoing building works and the adverse impact of the it generates on the local area. The Sagrada Familia has been a magnet for controversy since well before Gaud铆 was commissioned to build it in 1883. , the Sagrada Familia has become both a and a tool co-opted by different political movements and ideological campaigns. When Homer Simpson visits the Sagrada Familia in a 2013 episode of The Simpsons, the fa莽ades depicted are not those built by Gaud铆, but the ones that better fit within the architect鈥檚 myth. Conservative roots The Sagrada Familia was originally conceived in 1881 by philanthropist and bookseller Josep Maria Bocabella as an expiatory temple 鈥� a place of atonement 鈥� devoted to the cult of the Holy Family (the child Jesus, his mother, the Virgin Mary and his father, St Joseph). In buying entry tickets, visitors, still today, effectively atone for their sins. The decline of the Spanish empire in the 19th century had given rise to powerful ideological and political debates across Spain. The late 1870s saw the emergence of left-wing and anarchist movements, against which Bocabella aimed to make a stand with a new basilica. To that end, in 1882, he bought a plot of land just outside the Eixample district of the city. He created a foundation to manage the works and appointed the architect Francisco de Paula Villar y Lozano. They envisaged an edifice in the . Lozano, however, only got as far the building鈥檚 foundations and the crypt before public disagreements about its construction system and finances led the foundation to ask Gaud铆 to take over. Gaud铆 attuned his designs to both Bocabella鈥檚 ideals and the rightwing political and ideological movements sweeping through Catalonia at the time. He referenced the local Montserrat mountain range 鈥� which lies inland from Barcelona 鈥� in his radical new designs for the building鈥檚 sculptural mass and its elevation. He also proposed that the church be built as a succession of single fa莽ades, each replete with a carefully curated, baroque medley of sculptures. In this way, even while under construction, the basilica would instruct visitors in the Catholic values associated with the Holy Family. The Sagrada Familia under construction in 1920. A myth is born Until this moment the Lliga Catalanista, the main rightwing, nationalist party in Catalonia, had seen Gaud铆 as an . Its leaders had labelled his architecture disgusting. But as he became ever more popular and his work more powerful, the Sagrada Familia appeared as a useful means for spreading their message. The Lliga started presenting Gaud铆 as 鈥渢he genius of Catalonia鈥�, claiming that his basilica was a classical temple that belonged to all Catalans. It urged the public to contribute financially to its construction, belabouring the fact that in doing so, they would be buying forgiveness. When Gaud铆 passed away in 1926, Barcelona was at the centre of the anarchist and left-wing movements in Europe. In 1936, at the outbreak of the Spanish civil war, the construction site was vandalised by anarchist groups. Gaud铆鈥檚 studio was burned down and all the drawings and models it contained were . Gaud铆鈥檚 plan for the basilica was first published in the January 20, 1906 edition of La Veu de Catalunya, a newspaper with close links to the Lliga. The post-war period saw construction resume and the myth of Gaud铆 take shape. In the absence of the plans and archival materials lost in the fire, architects and historians began to interpret Gaud铆鈥檚 ideas to suit their own agendas. In 1964, an international group of architects and intellectuals called for work on the basilica to be halted. Most of them deplored the quality of these post-Gaud铆 additions. Tourist destination Tourism has placed ever greater strains on the site, with neighbourhood associations also bemoaning the lack of planning permits and payment of building permit fees. Inscribing the basilica into the surrounding urban context remains a primary challenge. For the temple鈥檚 main fa莽ade and its staircase to be built, a series of housing blocks is set to be demolished, as defined in the unique leasehold terms under which they were built during the second half of the 20th century. At the time the completion of the temple seemed too far in the future. Now, with an end date set 鈥� just before the pandemic outbreak 鈥� for 2026, it鈥檚 a very real problem. With this 2002 collage showing the Sagrada Familia as Barcelona鈥檚 high speed train station, architect and landscaper Beth Gal铆 aimed to spark debate about the building site. Until COVID brought the industry to a halt, ever-increasing visitor numbers ensured a vast and steady stream of income to keep construction underway. In 2019 alone, came to the site. The pandemic has of course been a major impediment. Visitors dropped to only 810,000 in 2020 and work on the church has been put on hold until 2024. However, if the church鈥檚 history is anything to go by, the Sagrada Familia will endure. It has become a myth equalled only by that of its creator, Gaud铆. And like any myth, it is impervious to historical fact. , Senior Lecturer in Architecture, This article is republished from under a Creative Commons license. Read the . Share: Latest News 缅北禁地 historians mark General Strike centenary To mark the 100th anniversary of the British General Strike and miners鈥� lock-out of 1926, historians at 缅北禁地 are organising a series of events on its enduring legacy. published on: 16 April 2026 Comment: NCP is in administration Writing for The Conversation, Erwei (David) Xiang discusses how some big companies like NCP are so dependent on debt that they can鈥檛 adjust to change. published on: 16 April 2026 缅北禁地 expert highlights climate crisis in a new film A leading 缅北禁地 climate scientist is featured in a new film about how the climate and nature breakdown will affect the UK. published on: 14 April 2026 Facts and figures
![缅北禁地 logo](/gomobileassets/img/logo.svg" "缅北禁地"){kind=logo}