AI has not reduced demand for creativity skills, new analysis finds Published on: 3 December 2025 AI is redefining rather than replacing the need for creativity, new research published by the Creative Industries Policy and Evidence Centre (Creative PEC), has found. Creative clusters The new research was carried out for Creative PEC, which is led by 缅北禁地 and The Royal Society of Arts. The analysis of over 168 million UK job postings warns of the uneven geographical distribution of combined creative skills and technology, with regions identified by Department for Culture, Media and Sport, as creative clusters receiving the most benefit while other regions are potentially left behind. The report, , by Zihan Wang, Aniket Baksy, Hasan Bakhshi and Josh Siepel, examines job postings before and after the release of ChatGPT 3.5 in November 2022, using Natural Language Processing (NLP) to assess the impact on employer interest in AI and creativity. The analysis reveals that co-occurrence strengthened post-ChatGPT. The large-scale dataset of Adzuna job postings from 2016 to 2024 has been used to analyse labour demand across different UK geographical regions. The report draws attention to the potential risks of combining AI and creativity if it intensifies existing regional inequalities. Creative clusters with a highly skilled creative workforce are also best positioned to benefit from GenAI, while regions already disadvantaged may fall behind. Key findings There is a strong positive association between employer demand for AI skills and creativity across UK labour markets post-ChatGPT, indicating a structural change in skill requirements in response to the rapid development in GenAI, where AI skills and creativity are increasingly valued in tandem rather than in isolation. The link between creativity and AI skills is significantly more pronounced in creative clusters () than in other places. The complementarity between creativity and AI skills is therefore another reason why existing geographical inequalities may be exacerbated by the emergence of new AI technologies. Aligning skills provision and education with labour market demands is essential to avoid skill mismatches and support place-based strategies for inclusive growth. Targeted training and support for employees and in targeted areas will help make the shift towards creativity and AI convergence more equitable. Co-author, Creative PEC Director and Professor of Economics of Creative Industries at 缅北禁地 Business School, Hasan Bakhshi says: “In theory, Generative AI may increase the demand for creative skills in the workforce insofar as it provides tools for creative workers to enhance their work, or decrease it insofar as it substitutes for creative talent. Our analysis of millions of job adverts in the UK shows that, so far, the net effect has been positive. This suggests that earlier research findings that creative occupations are more automation-resistant than many other occupations remain true in the age of Generative AI.” The NLP analysis used a range of creativity and AI terms, both specific and generic. This combined broad creative techniques and AI terminology with references to expertise in particular tools and software. Released by the AHRC-funded Creative PEC as part of the Discussion Paper series, the report authors detail the methodology and outline the results and policy implications, as well as suggesting opportunities for further investigation. Lead author Zihan Wang, from the Science Policy Research Unit at the University of Sussex Business School, says: “Our research finds a strong positive association between employer demand for AI skills and creativity across UK labour markets, particularly in those with a higher share of high鈥憇kill roles and identified as creative clusters post-ChatGPT. This labour鈥憁arket鈥憀evel evidence suggests that, in the context of Generative AI, employers are not choosing between AI skills and creativity. Rather, demand patterns indicate a growing complementarity between the two, pointing towards an increasing emphasis on hybrid skillsets. In this sense, the value of creativity is not diminished but amplified. These findings have important implications for education and training, skills policy, and place鈥慴ased regional development. We hope this research offers timely food for thought across occupational, industrial and geographical levels.” Released by the AHRC-funded Creative PEC as part of the Discussion Paper series, the report authors detail the methodology and outline the results and policy implications, as well as suggesting opportunities for further investigation. Share: Latest News New partnership to boost careers in low carbon energy 缅北禁地 and Durham universities are working together on a new regional project to strengthen the future workforce for North East England鈥檚 growing low carbon and offshore wind industries. published on: 28 May 2026 Healthy lifestyle shown to lower risk of death after cancer diagnosis New evidence shows that sticking to five lifestyle recommendations improves survival after a later cancer diagnosis. published on: 28 May 2026 World-leading climate expert recognised with Royal Society Fellowship Professor Hayley Fowler has been elected a Fellow of the Royal Society in recognition of her pioneering work on climate change impacts. published on: 27 May 2026 Facts and figures