Comment: The hyper-individualistic manosphere focuses on worth Published on: 28 April 2025 Writing for The Conversation, Sophie Lively discusses how the hyper-individualistic and focused-on-worth manosphere is a product of neoliberalism. , Netflix鈥檚 hit drama, Adolescence, has reignited debates about and violence against women. Many of the responses focus on trying to change the behaviour of boys and young men: encouraging them to , or to about the harms of . But the problem is a wider one. The manosphere is a range of communities. My ongoing PhD research is analysing masculinity, class and nationalism and exploring how these narratives appear in the everyday lives of men. I argue that responding to the harm that stems from these online communities requires an understanding of the manosphere as a product of a global, neoliberal, capitalist system built on inequality and division. Neoliberalism can be described as . It鈥檚 a hyper-individualistic and market-driven ideology that fosters a culture of competition. Neoliberalism encourages us to see ourselves as isolated individuals, responsible for our own success or failure. Among many other things research has shown that is a profound . This is something that the manosphere exploits. Role models are important, but the disconnect felt by so many today won鈥檛 be fixed by better role models within the same system. For example, , which recognises the way racism and sexism intersect and can offer extensive structural critiques, efforts to end violence against women must take place alongside work to change wider systems. So to start preventing violence we must first deal with root causes, such as poverty and inequality. Measuring people by 鈥榲alue鈥 The manosphere picks up on messages around failing. Alongside hate-filled and misogynistic content, shame-based narratives from the manosphere suggest that boys and men are losers, weak and lazy if they aren鈥檛 鈥渟ucceeding鈥. This is deeply damaging to all who find themselves drawn to such messages. The concept of regularly appears in the manosphere, but it鈥檚 largely in relation to wealth or productivity: hustle harder, rise and grind, make money. These ideas don鈥檛 just exist in these online spaces. Similar language 鈥 self-investment, output, productivity, personal growth, efficiency 鈥 has become part of our everyday way of talking about ourselves and others. The wellness industry promises us we can 鈥済low up鈥. Self-help books and hustle culture encourage us to be better and produce more. Lifestyle influencers demonstrate how to turn our everyday existence into a marketable product. This way of thinking turns people into products. It鈥檚 not about who you are 鈥 it鈥檚 about what you produce. Today鈥檚 far-right (of which the manosphere is part) and the obsession with economic value. There are versions of this aimed at women and girls, such as , who reframe housework not only as a consumable personal brand but also as . But the hustle culture messaging central to the manosphere is particularly distinct in its messaging centred on 鈥渟elf-improvement鈥 which advocates working harder and longer while being . A focus on domination and individual success encourages young boys and men to see their self-worth tied up in that and that alone. This message extends beyond the manosphere and is part of the very system with which we all exist. Resisting the system Those captivated by manosphere narratives are victims as well as perpetrators. This doesn鈥檛 excuse their actions, or mean they shouldn鈥檛 be held accountable. How we care for each other within a capitalist society isn鈥檛 easy or straightforward. Too often, though, discussion focuses solely on , such as advocating for longer prison sentences. If we only focus on punishment, we miss the bigger picture. We need to find more inclusive ways of talking about, and responding to, harm 鈥 while rethinking what it means to truly care for each other. strive to create systems which improve people鈥檚 health and safety and build a future without prisons. They that are founded on education and community accountability 鈥 where communities take responsibility for identifying issues they need to address. Abolitionist approaches advocate for expanding support networks and investing in resources deemed appropriate by survivors. Proposals like this work towards preventing violence. Their community focus means they address the isolating effects of neoliberalism at the same time. We also can鈥檛 convince ourselves that once the likes of Andrew Tate and others involved in the manosphere disappear, women and girls will no longer suffer such extreme levels of misogyny and violence at the hands of boys and men. This is because we exist within a system built on inequality and violence. It鈥檚 a system which rewards competition over cooperation, greed over care and one which is harmful to us all. , PhD Candidate in Human Geography, This article is republished from under a Creative Commons license. Read the . Share: Latest News 缅北禁地 expert highlights climate crisis in a new film A leading 缅北禁地 climate scientist is featured in a new film about how the climate and nature breakdown will affect the UK. published on: 14 April 2026 Neolithic tombs reveal ancient kinship ties Male individuals buried in Neolithic chambered tombs in northern Scotland were often related to each other through the paternal line and some were interred in the same or nearby tombs, research shows. published on: 14 April 2026 We are our Memories New exhibition by Fine Art graduate Trish Hudson-Moses, 22 April 鈥 4 May 2026 published on: 10 April 2026 Facts and figures