Peer Assessment using Canvas Peer Review

NEW: A vision for education and skills at 缅北禁地: Education for Life 2030+

Peer assessment

Peer assessment is an effective way of engaging students in active learning and facilitates their increased understanding of the assessment process. Information on how you can use Peer Assessment in your module and more detail on the benefits can be found on the Leading Edge Curriculum Peer Assessment webpage.

You can conduct peer assessment manually (eg ask students to exchange scripts by email) but for larger groups it will be easier to use one of the tools available in Canvas. These will help you to manage the process, make sure it is fair, and have oversight of the quality of reviews that students are writing.

Set up a peer assessment in Canvas to gather peer reviews of individual pieces of work. It is recommended you use a
Use peer review discussions to enable students to give feedback on another students reply to a class discussion. Information below
You can ask groups to submit a piece of groupwork which will then be reviewed as a group task by other groups (inter-group review) Information below
For group work projects you can use BuddyCheck as a tool enable group members to review the contribution of peers in their group (intra-group review). You can use this to generate individual marks based on the mark you give the group for their assessed project.

On this page we’ll explain some of the options for Canvas Peer Review and signpost the step-by-step guides that will walk you through the processes involved.

Canvas Peer Review

If you would like individual students to review the individual work of other students you can set this up using a (marking with SpeedGrader).

A peer review assignment will involve the following stages

Students submit their assignment – you set an initial assignment due date
After the assignment due date work is allocated to peers – there’s a review start date.
Student reviews are released to their peers
You can view the reviews submitted by students. Canvas give you the option of adding comments.
You have the option of marking the initial assignment and releasing your final marks to students.

The table below details of the features available in Canvas peer review.

Feature	Canvas/SpeedGrader
Plagiarism review	Yes – set Turnitin as the similarity checker in assignment setup
Submission types and file sizes	Multiple files (video and audio); 250 MB file size limit
Automatically assign reviews
Manually assign reviews
Assign multiple reviews to each student	Yes – using or approaches
Anonymous peer reviews	Yes, this can be . Student reviewers cannot see the name of the person whose work they are reviewing.
Can students who do not submit an assessment conduct reviews	Students won’t be automatically allocated peer reviews, but an instructor can manually assign reviews to a student who did not submit.
Methods to guide student reviews	Students use the same options that are available to teachers i.e. Canvas rubrics/grading forms, bubble comments, final comments
Can reviewers assign marks	Only if you add a rubric to the assignment
How do you monitor and mark reviews	– you can add comments to this.
Control when reviews are released to students	This is not possible - reviews are available to students as soon as they are created.
Set a deadline for the review activity	(i.e. by adding a calendar entry.) Students can continue to review work after this time.
Provide a final mark to students (optional)	By marking the initial assignment in SpeedGrader
How do students know if they have a peer review to complete?
How do students access reviews/feedback

Adding peer review to Canvas assignments

If you are setting up a peer review assignment for the first time see our Wayfinder this takes you through steps involved and signposts the relevant Canvas guides.

The following Canvas guides describe key steps in the process:

Instructor guides

There is also guidance on how to use Peer Assessment on your modules

Peer Review of Canvas Discussions

A peer review discussion enables students to provide feedback on another student's reply on a course discussion.

Peer reviews can only be added as part of a graded discussion and unlike peer review assignments, discussions cannot be assigned anonymously.

As an instructor:
As a student:

Group assignments and review of other groups work (inter-group)

You may want to add group peer review to a group assignment.

For example, if you have set a task requiring groups to work together to produce a presentation, you may wish to ask each group to collaboratively review the work of one or more other groups.

There are a number of approaches that you could use to manage this, but no clear best approach.

Peer review group assignments in Canvas

We can create a group assignment in Canvas in which one member of a group submits work on behalf of their group. However, any subsequent peer reviews attached to this assignment become individual tasks (i.e. each individual member from group 1 will review a copy of another group's assignment shown against a member that group).
You may be able to work around this limitation with guidance to a group leader.

Use discussions or collaborative spaces to manage inter-group review

To organise a collaborative group response, you could follow a process like this:

Require students to post their group output on Canvas (e.g. , or submitting them to a discussion board). If you also wished to mark the group output you could create a group assignment and require one of the group to submit their files to this area.
Make it clear which group is providing feedback for which group with some instructions on Canvas.
Ask the reviewing group to post their feedback 鈥� as a reply to the discussion board post or as a file attachment/ link on the Canvas page.
Add calendar items to make the deadlines for the review task clear.

Do get in touch with LTDS if you would like to discuss options in the context of your students and assessment needs.

Peer evaluation of contribution to group work

Buddycheck鈥痠s a Canvas integrated tool for peer evaluation of group work contribution. It can be used to enable students to鈥痚valuate鈥痶heir own and their鈥痯eer's鈥痗ontribution to, and performance in, group work.鈥� The output is an adjustment factor which can be used to update the mark awarded to each student individually.

For more information on how Buddycheck can be used on your group work assessments, please follow the link to the Buddycheck webpages.

Get in touch

Email support